A still pale-lavender sky with a single slow-moving cloud and a lot of empty space.

Design is a way of paying attention.

Five principles, each one tied to published research, including the findings that cut against us.

A website is judged before it is read. That sounds like a slogan, but it is one of the better tested findings in how people use the web. What follows is what the research supports, what it does not, and what we do about it on every build.

1. The first impression is visual, and it is fast.

In a 2006 study, people rated web pages they saw for a twentieth of a second, then again for half a second. The two sets of ratings lined up closely. The judgment about how a page looks forms about as fast as the eye can take it in, well before anyone reads a headline.

A large Stanford study found the same thing from another angle: when people explained why they trusted a site or not, the look of the design came up in 46.1 percent of their comments, more than anything else. So we treat the first screen as the handshake. It has to feel right before it has to say anything.

0.05 sHow long people saw a page before rating its visual appeal.
Lindgaard and colleagues, 2006. Ratings at 50 milliseconds matched ratings at 500 milliseconds.

2. Looking easy and being easy are different jobs.

Since 1995, studies have shown that attractive interfaces are judged easier to use, and that the judgment sticks even after people use them. The same studies are careful to say what that does not mean: the attractive version was not actually easier. It only felt that way.

Feeling easy and being easy are measured separately, and they do not always move together. That is the honest version of the argument for design, and it is why we do both jobs: make the site look easy, then make sure it is.

How easy it looksShaped by layout, type, color and photography. Formed in the first moment.
How easy it isShaped by speed, forms, wording and where the buttons sit. Tested by use.
Kurosu and Kashimura, 1995, called these apparent and inherent usability. Tractinsky and colleagues, 2000, found the first shaped how usable people said a system was, even after using it.

3. Clear beats clever.

Things that are easy to take in are liked more, trusted more and even judged more likely to be true. Psychologists call it processing fluency. Clean contrast, a familiar layout and plain words all raise it.

The conversion data points the same way. In one landing page platform’s benchmark of 41,000 pages, copy written at a 5th to 7th grade reading level converted at more than twice the rate of copy written at a “professional” level. We write for smart adults who are busy, not for other marketers.

  • 5th to 7th grade reading level11.1%
  • Professional reading level5.3%
Average landing page conversion rate by reading level. A landing page platform’s Q4 2024 benchmark (464 million visits, 41,000 pages), as summarized in our research.

4. Speed is part of the design.

A page that has not loaded has no design at all. Mobile research from a major search platform found that more than half of mobile visits are abandoned when a page takes longer than three seconds, and the steepest losses happen between one and three.

When polish and speed pull in different directions, the evidence sides with speed and clarity. So heavy effects, oversized images and extra scripts have to earn their place on our pages, and most of them do not.

53%Share of mobile visits abandoned when a page takes longer than three seconds to load.
Mobile research from a major search platform, as summarized in our research.

5. Carry one idea past the first screen.

When we audited a whole category of manufacturer websites, almost every one had a good opening: a strong photo, a real line of copy. Almost none kept it going. One click in, every site turned into the same stack of interchangeable modules.

The brands that hold attention treat every section as the next chapter of one story. That matters because feeling does real work: in an analysis of 996 advertising campaigns, emotional campaigns beat rational ones on every brand measure studied. A page that only lists features gives that away.

TemplateOne strong ideaProduct carouselGrid of categoriesSustainability blurbList of links
StoryOne strong ideaThe idea, provenThe idea, in useThe idea, in detailThe next step
The pattern from our category audit, simplified. Binet and Field, IPA, 2013, for the campaign analysis.

What we will not claim.

Beautiful design does not make a product work better; it makes it feel better, which is why we build for both. No controlled study proves design alone raises revenue; the strongest evidence shows a close link, not proof. And popular stories about logos triggering dopamine trace back to a television segment with one subject, not a study.

Sources.

  1. Lindgaard, Fernandes, Dudek and Brown, "Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression!", Behaviour and Information Technology, 2006.
  2. Fogg and colleagues, "How Do People Evaluate a Website’s Credibility?", Stanford Web Credibility Project, 2002.
  3. Kurosu and Kashimura, "Apparent Usability vs. Inherent Usability", CHI ’95 Conference Companion, 1995.
  4. Tractinsky, Katz and Ikar, "What Is Beautiful Is Usable", Interacting with Computers, 2000.
  5. Reber, Schwarz and Winkielman, "Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2004.
  6. Binet and Field, The Long and the Short of It, IPA, 2013.
Field and Form, a fictional architecture studio: a large headline, a numbered project list and a sunlit living room photo.
Concept: Field and Form, a fictional architecture studio.

The point is not to make more noise. It is to make the next thing clearer.

Put the research to work on your site.

We start with how your customers decide, then design and build around it.